By Christian Jarrett
Great Myths of the Brain introduces readers to the sector of neuroscience through analyzing renowned myths in regards to the human brain.
- Explores commonly-held myths of the mind in the course of the lens of clinical examine, backing up claims with stories and different facts from the literature
- Looks at enduring myths corresponding to “Do we simply use 10% of our brain?”, “Pregnant ladies lose their mind”, “Right-brained everyone is extra artistic” and plenty of more.
- Delves into myths with regards to particular mind issues, together with epilepsy, autism, dementia, and others
- Written engagingly and accessibly for college students and lay readers alike, delivering a different advent to the examine of the brain
- Teaches readers the way to spot neuro hype and neuro-nonsense claims within the media
Read Online or Download Great Myths of the Brain (Great Myths of Psychology) PDF
Similar Biology books
In Why We Run, biologist, award-winning nature author, and ultramarathoner Bernd Heinrich explores a brand new standpoint on human evolution by means of interpreting the phenomenon of ultraendurance and makes outstanding discoveries in regards to the actual, non secular -- and primal -- force to win. right now lyrical and medical, Why We Run indicates Heinrich's signature mixture of biology, anthropology, psychology, and philosophy, infused along with his ardour to find how and why we will be able to in attaining superhuman skills.
Evolution: parts and Mechanisms introduces the various contemporary discoveries and insights that experience further to the self-discipline of natural evolution, and combines them with the most important issues had to achieve a basic knowing of the mechanisms of evolution. each one bankruptcy covers a major subject or issue pertinent to a contemporary realizing of evolutionary conception, permitting easy accessibility to specific themes for both examine or evaluation.
Fractals and chaos are presently producing pleasure throughout a variety of clinical and scientific disciplines. Biomedical investigators, graduate scholars, and undergraduates have gotten more and more drawn to employing fractals and chaos (nonlinear dynamics) to quite a few difficulties in biology and medication.
Belief is essential to our daily lives, but it may be harmful. with no trusting others, we won't functionality in society, or perhaps remain alive for terribly lengthy, yet being overly trustful can depart us open to exploitation and abuse. and never purely is belief pragmatic, however it additionally has an ethical size: trustworthiness is a advantage, and well-placed belief merits us all.
Extra info for Great Myths of the Brain (Great Myths of Psychology)
Does whatever go away the attention after we see? Extramission ideals of youngsters and adults. present instructions in mental technological know-how, 5(5), 137–142. a hundred ninety Winer, G. A. , Cottrell, J. E. , Gregg, V. , Fournier, J. S. , & Bica, L. A. (2002). essentially false impression visible notion: Adults' trust in visible emissions. American Psychologist, 57(6–7), 417. 191 Rose, N. , & Abi-Rached, J. M. (2013). Neuro: the hot mind Sciences and the administration of the brain. Princeton collage Press. 192 Chancellor, B. , & Chatterjee, A. (2011). mind branding: while neuroscience and trade collide. AJOB Neuroscience, 2(4), 18–27. 193 http://www. neuroleadership. org/institute/index. shtml (accessed could 15, 2014). 194 http://neuroesthetics. org/institute. Hypertext Preprocessor (accessed might 15, 2014). 195 http://www. neuroesthetics. org/statement-on-neuroesthetics. Hypertext Preprocessor (accessed could 15, 2014). 196 http://www. rsablogs. org. uk/2013/socialbrain/brains-spirituality/ (accessed may perhaps 15, 2014). 197 http://nplusonemag. com/rise-neuronovel (accessed may possibly 15, 2014). 198 Álvarez, M. P. (2011). The magnetism of neuroimaging: model, fable and beliefs of the mind. Papeles del Psicólogo, 32(2), 98–112. 199 Rodriguez, P. (2006). conversing brains: A cognitive semantic research of an rising folks neuropsychology. Public figuring out of technological know-how, 15(3), 301–330. 2 hundred http://www. theguardian. com/science/2013/mar/03/brain-not-simple-folk-neuroscience (accessed may well 15, 2014). 201 Lindebaum, D. , & Zundel, M. (2013). no longer particularly a revolution: Scrutinizing organizational neuroscience in management experiences. Human family members, 66(6), 857–877. 202 http://trustedadvisor. com/trustmatters/how-neuroscience-over-reaches-in-business (accessed may perhaps 15, 2014). 203 http://www. nature. com/news/neuroaesthetics-is-killing-your-soul-1. 12640 (accessed might 15, 2014). 204 Choudhury, S. , McKinney, ok. A. , & Merten, M. (2012). Rebelling opposed to the mind: Public engagement with the “neurological adolescent. ” Social technological know-how & medication, 74(4), 565–573. 205 Bröer, C. , & Heerings, M. (2012). Neurobiology in private and non-private discourse: The case of adults with ADHD. Sociology of well-being & disease, 35(1), 49–65. 206 http://www. economist. com/node/8453850 (accessed may possibly 15, 2014). 207 De Brigard, F. , Mandelbaum, E. , & Ripley, D. (2009). accountability and the mind sciences. moral thought and ethical perform, 12(5), 511–524. 208 Aspinwall, L. G. , Brown, T. R. , & Tabery, J. (2012). The double-edged sword: Does biomechanism raise or reduce judges' sentencing of psychopaths? technology, 337(6096), 846–849. 209 Vohs, ok. D. , & Schooler, J. W. (2008). the worth of believing in loose will: Encouraging a trust in determinism raises dishonest. mental technology, 19(1), 49–54. 210 http://rolfzwaan. blogspot. nl/2013/03/the-value-of-believing-in-free-will. html (accessed may perhaps 15, 2014). 211 http://skepdic. com/neurolin. html (accessed might 15, 2014). 212 Witkowski, T. (2010). Thirty-five years of analysis on neuro-linguistic programming. NLP study facts base. state-of-the-art or pseudoscientific ornament? Polish mental Bulletin, 41(2), 58–66.